I'll be posting more of my thoughts from Information Online 2009 over the next week, but some people have already done such a good job summarising and commenting on some of the keynotes that I encourage you to read their posts as well.
Anticipating the Future of Libraries (and many other things!): Andy Hines, futurist, adjunct professor of Future Studies at University of Houston Andy gave a fantastic presentation on the following trends/challenges: 1. Values 2. Demography 3. Lifestyle 4. Technology 5. Work 6. Education Strawberries of Integrity posted an excellent summary here, please read it!
Libraries as Happiness Engines - Liz Lawley, director of the Lab for Social Computing at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Liz had some very interesting thoughts on how taking a gaming/fun approach to libraries, work and more can increase happiness AND productivity (shock!). She identified the elements of happiness as:
satisfying work to do
the experience of being good at something
time spent with people we like
the chance to be part of something bigger than yourself
And points out that many of these are more accessible in the online gaming world than real life - no wonder people like games! More on how this applies to libraries etc here.
Liz also pointed out Ravelry as an example of an object-oriented network - where the network is not based just around people but a particular object (in this case yarn and knitting patterns etc). She suggests that the next step for libraries is to turn catalogues into this kind of social network. I think we (publishers) should turn our online research collections into them too! More on that from my previous post.
Anna Pearson has also been writing up some of her thoughts on Information Online...have a look at those too!
Dr Sherman Young was an excellent presenter, and the concepts and issues he discussed stayed with me right through the conference. The title of his book alone is enough to command attention - "The book is dead: Long live the book".
Dr Young's key point is that we need to disassociate the concept of the book - something that requires a significant investment of time and thought by the author, editor/publisher and reader - from the print, paper and glue that is its origin. The rest of this post is based on the notes I took throughout his presentation.
Dr Sherman Young by neerav bhatt
A History of the World and the Internet in 4 1/2 slides each. Dr Young started by giving an overview of the development of media and communication, from oral culture to the internet. He notes that upheaval that each development - written word, the printing press, the radio - caused, and the naysayers (starting with Plato!). He goes on to outline the development of the internet and the changes it is bringing to our research, reading and literacy culture. Then he played Apple's "Knowledge Navigator" vision from 1987 - which is the next step from Web 2.0 into the semantic web.
Where do books fit in a post Web 2.o world? Now on to the meat of Dr Young's talk: What of books in this new world? In the footsteps of Alfred Hitchcock: "The Trouble with Harry" ....Harry's dead. So are books. Books don't seem to have a place. In the world of the Knowledge Navigator, books are props that line the dusty shelves of the academic's study.
In our world:
Content in books is hidden from the basic google search.
Iphone: millions of videos and music on your phone - but not many books!!! (Unless you like Harlequin Romance, which IS available on Iphone. Yeesh!)
Dr Young contends that book culture and print culture getting confused. And as Jeff Jarvis said, "Print is where books go to die".
A book's core attributes. But if it is not "a printed object", what is a book? Dr Young explains the core attributes of a "book":
Time. Books take time to write and time to read. It is a "premium of time" that must be committed by authors, publishers and readers
Deeper content - the result of all that time.
Not required to react to current events - more reflective, thorough approach.
And then the reader must create the world themselves by engaging with the book. Unlike a movie where everything is created and visualised for you, there is a space that must be negotiated by the reader to be meaningful.
Essentially, it's like cooking and eating a Casserole compared to a Big Mac.
But the book is not dead yet - it's just resting.
The future: Gam3r Th3ory - each chapter discussed and reviewed online before publishing Wikibooks at Yale - read AND contribute to free scholarly works from Yale. Yale Books unbound - read and add comments to published works which are now freely available online. This is based on "CommentPress" software that (I think) was developed by the Institute of the Future of the Book.
So how can we encourage "real books" - long form text?
ebooks. 68000 at MQ in 2007. Interstingly though, several of the papers from the conference focused on the difficulty in building awareness of e-books among academics and students. So this particular solution has a way to go.
Google books. Puts books back in the online conversation with higher, more effective result rankings.
Dr Youn'g final point was that we are experience a time of creative destruction. We need to navigate this time and ensure that books survive with the videos and blogs etc. But librarians need to support authors and publishers trying to work out new publishing, copyright and distribution models.
Books should be part of the online world, not separate. This is our challenge: to make sure that we continue to value books.
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it" - ALan Kay
My thoughts. This is an amazing vision which publishers really need to explore. In fact, we are already poking around the edges...one of the potential modifications of the new CCH Intelliconnect platform (coming this year) will be to allow comments and annotations to our online books and commentary. But thoroughly integrating our publications into the stream of the internet will be a much bigger challenge.
I finally have the chance to process some of my thoughts about the Tuesday morning sessions.
Senator Conroy, Minister for Broadband etc, got off to a good start by praising ALIA and the "vital role" it plays in developing future directions in information flow. Lots of good words about the value of the digital economy etc, and the necessity of providing education around media literacy - the ability to find and assess material on the internet.
However, the room suddenly got hostile when he moved on to the topic of internet filtering in public places to reduce cyber crime. There were plenty of public librarians (and general librarians) in the room with plenty of thoughts on filtering and freedom of access. Many of them contributed to the policy exposure draft last year, voicing concerns about the inaccuracy of filtering services leading to blocking of safe content (I should know, happens all the time at work) and how it also can slow down the entire system (I've also experienced that!) Conroy tried to reassure us that this would be extensively tested, but I'm not sure that many were convinced. Plus there was something that sounded suspiciously like a threat - that as publically funded, public institutions we will have to abide by govt policy. Ouch. Talk about insulting.
Anyway, Conroy also had some interesting statistics from an Australian report I shall have to follow up. Here they are:
73% of househoulds in Australia have access or use public services such as libraries.
72% read online news 62% use online maps 36% subscribe to e newsletters 37% look up health info 27% look up government info 24% look up local community info
26% engaged in online social networking 16% read blogs 13% online forums 12% online chat
I find some of these numbers surprisingly low, especially given the results of our own whitepaper. For example, we found that 33% read blogs compared to 16%. I have a theory that this is because we surveyed professionals, a highly educated & literate section of the population who are more likely to have regular internet access and an interest in blogs. What do you think?
Edited to add: Read the speech transcript here. View the speech here.
I finally managed to connect at the CCH stand at the conference. Huzzah! I'm planning to skip a couple of sessions so maybe I'll have time to add all the posts I was too tired to yesterday.
Lots of people have been coming past and picking up copies of our "Professionals and Web 2.0" whitepaper. I spent so much time working on it with the team, it's great to see it getting some interest. I'll be presenting on it and CCH's new research platform at 5.10 today in Theaterette 3. Please come - everybody else will be getting ready for the dinner! :(
I am absolutely pooped after a big day one of Information Online. I'll give a few general impressions in this post and then post summaries and observations on the presentations in separate posts.
First of all, I looove the conference satchel. I promptly ditched my tatty old laptop bag that ONLY fit the laptop, because this one fits the laptop, my leather folder, and probably half of Asia too. AND it sits on my shoulder better. Sadly one of the handles tore away but a lovely conference goer promised me she will bring hers around to the stand tomorrow because she doesn't want it. Woohoo!
Second of all, great organisation and efficiency all round (with the exception of a couple of timing issues but nothing major). The conference committee and volunteers I chatted with were all very helpful and friendly. Nice work.
Thirdly, our CCH stand rocks! (yes I know, shameless corporate plug.) It's all shiney and white and green and fresh (which was the whole point). It's a pleasure to hang around. Plus we have mints. And pens. And who can say no to mints and pens? Everybody should come and visit me there tomorrow, we're not far from the main lunch area (stall 111).
Fourthly - one major disappointment.
No free wifi.
So instead of loading up my notes after each session, I will be doing it in one big lump tonight. Huzzah. Plus I missed the opportunity for direct interaction with other people online via tweets and live blogging.
This is something I really don't understand. If Maccas (and many libraries) can provide free wifi, why can't they manage it in hotels and conference venues? Charging $20 an hour in hotels or $165 for three days of a conference is exorbitant. What a rip off. When it comes to an Online Information event it should really be included in the cost of conference attendance. Not that I blame the organisers, they are probably subject to the whims of the venue.
On that note, I should technically have internet access because I am representing a vendor in the exhibit (and we did buy wifi access!). However I couldn't seem to log on with the password supplied, although the rest of the team could. Today was just too busy for me to sort it out, but I might try and get it fixed up tomorrow.
The conference offers a net cafe, but this seems very 2002 to me. The day was so jam-packed that I had no time to visit it, plus all my notes were on MY computer so I would have had to USB them across. Tedious.
Next year I would suggest one of two options. The first is obvious - free wifi for all! But if that is not possible, I suggest encouraging bloggers to register as such in advance, and then give them sponsored wifi access. After all, we are providing free media and exposure for the conference, so it's a fair exchange.
Posts
